Untitled Document
 
연구사업 |학술회의 |소식/안내 |자료실 |동영상/갤러리 |
 
 
 
 
>> 추천도서
>> 보고서
>> 논문
>> 발표/강의
>> 뉴스기사
>> 운영위원칼럼
>> 공지사항
 
[한국산업식품공학회] 추계 ...
 
제   목  
미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 - IFT Newsletter
[ 2012-06-21 09:29:06 ]
글쓴이  
관리자
조회수: 22095        
다운로드 #1  
IFT_Newsletter_June_2012_한글_문서.hwp ( 48 KB ), Down: 7143

1. 미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 (2012년 5월 1일)

2. 미국 캘리포니아주, GM식품 표시제도 강화에 대한 주민투표(11월 실시예정)

 

FDA urges removal of some Korean seafood products from the marketThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is urging food distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators to remove from sale or service all fresh, frozen, canned, and processed oysters, clams, mussels, and whole and roe-on scallops (molluscan shellfish) from Korea that have entered the United States. This includes molluscan shellfish from Korea that entered the United States prior to May 1, 2012, when the FDA removed such products from the Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL), and that which may have inadvertently entered the country after that date. These products and any products made with them may have been exposed to human fecal waste and are potentially contaminated with norovirus.

Molluscan shellfish contaminated with fecal waste and/or norovirus are considered adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Following initial notifications in May, a number of food companies have begun to remove these products from their distribution chain. However, many others have yet to take action.

A comprehensive FDA evaluation determined that the Korean Shellfish Sanitation Program (KSSP) no longer meets the sanitation controls specified under the United States’ National Shellfish Sanitation Program. The FDA’s evaluation found significant deficiencies with the KSSP including inadequate sanitary controls, ineffective management of land-based pollution sources, and detection of norovirus in shellfish growing areas.

The deficiencies in the KSSP prompted the FDA to remove all Korean certified shippers of molluscan shellfish from the ICSSL on May 1, 2012. Although Korean molluscan shellfish represent only a small fraction of the oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops sold in the U.S., the removal of Korean shellfish shippers from the ICSSL is an important step in stopping the importation of molluscan shellfish harvested from polluted waters.

These actions only affect molluscan shellfish harvested from Korean waters. They do not affect the receipt of fresh and frozen molluscan shellfish by distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators from any of the other shellfish shippers listed in the ICSSL. Further, these actions do not affect the importation of canned and other processed product made with molluscan shellfish harvested from non-Korean waters. The FDA is in ongoing discussions with Korean authorities to resolve the issue.

Press release

California to vote on GMO labelingAccording to the Associated Press, California voters will decide this November whether to require special labels for food made from genetically modified ingredients. Advocates collected more than half a million signatures supporting the stronger labeling requirements, and the Secretary of State has certified the measure for the state’s November ballot.

If it passes, California would be the first state to require labeling of such a wide range of foods containing GMOs. The proposal would require most processed foods by 2014 to bear a label telling shoppers that they contain ingredients derived from plants whose DNA was altered with genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria.

Many backers of similar legislation in more than a dozen states say the intent is to give consumers more information about what they’re eating, and foster transparency and trust in the food system. Major agricultural groups and the processed food industry oppose stricter labeling, saying it risks sowing fear and confusion among shoppers.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says genetically modified foods pose no greater health risks than traditional foods. Opponents of labeling rules say they could prompt hikes in packaging costs. If the measure passes, most raw or processed food made from plants or animals with engineered genetic material would need to be labeled, although certified organic foods and alcohol would be exempted. Meat and dairy products also would not require a label if the animals are fed with genetically engineered grains.

AP article




2/199, 총 게시물 : 3971
3951 품종 개량은 되고 생명공학은 안 된다는 억지 - 주간조선 식량안보연구소 2026-09-17 0 265
3950 ′GMO완전표시제′ 가공 단계·품목별 특성 등 고려해 표시 대상·범위 검토해야 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-09-10 0 300
3949 "간장에도 GMO 표시"…연말 완전표시제 시행에 식품업계 ′긴장′ - 뉴스1 식량안보연구소 2026-09-07 0 289
3948 국가 식량안보 수준 매년 진단ㆍ평가…상시 공개 - 식품저널 식량안보연구소 2026-09-04 0 304
3947 포퓰리즘 식품 정책이 국민 건강을 위협한다 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-09-03 1 337
3946 [기고] 지속 가능한 미래 단백질, 효모에서 길을 찾자 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-09-03 0 321
3945 벼 재배면적 67만ha…지난해보다 7500ha 감소 - 식품저널 식량안보연구소 2026-09-01 0 333
3944 배달의민족 주인이 미국으로?… - 식품저널 식량안보연구소 2026-09-01 0 318
3943 러시아 흑해 곡물 수출량 65% 급감… 글로벌 수급 불안 고조- 글로벌이코노믹 식량안보연구소 2026-08-28 0 337
3942 외국인이 줄 서서 먹는 K푸드가 있다?…해외로 가는 ′K급식′ - 비즈워치 식량안보연구소 2026-08-26 0 358
3941 GMO 완전표시제 D-100일…Non-GMO 원료 수급 가능한가? - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-24 0 350
3940 K-FOOD 세계화, 이제 ′글로벌 비즈니스 아키텍트′가 필요하다 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-24 0 346
3939 [칼럼] 전통 발효 식품과 소금 섭취 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-18 0 356
3938 20년 협의 과정 물거품된 ′GMO 완전표시제′ - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-18 0 373
3937 20년 GMO 장벽 허문 EU, 유전자 편집 작물 연다 - 팜뉴스 식량안보연구소 2026-08-14 0 397
3936 ‘소이 컨넥스트 2026’, 역대 최대 규모 성료 - 식품저널 식량안보연구소 2026-08-13 0 394
3935 [기고] 기생충에 의한 식중독 사고, 결코 남의 일이 아니다 - 식품음료신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-13 0 369
3934 GMO 완전표시제, 국산콩 산업의 만능 해법 아니다 - 한국농업신문 식량안보연구소 2026-08-12 0 375
3933 "원료 확보할 시간도 없다" GMO 완전표시제 조기 시행에 업계 ′혼란′ - 뉴시스 식량안보연구소 2026-08-11 0 391
3932 서민 물가·식량 안보 위협하는 GMO 완전표시제 - 동아사이언스 식량안보연구소 2026-07-30 0 504
첫 페이지 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10     끝 페이지
이름 제목 내용
 
 
   
  A few images from Freepik.com