Untitled Document
 
연구사업 |학술회의 |소식/안내 |자료실 |동영상/갤러리 |
 
 
 
 
>> 추천도서
>> 보고서
>> 논문
>> 발표/강의
>> 뉴스기사
>> 운영위원칼럼
>> 공지사항
 
[한국산업식품공학회] 추계 ...
 
제   목  
미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 - IFT Newsletter
[ 2012-06-21 09:29:06 ]
글쓴이  
관리자
조회수: 22224        
다운로드 #1  
IFT_Newsletter_June_2012_한글_문서.hwp ( 48 KB ), Down: 7168

1. 미국 FDA, 한국산 굴 등 조개류 판매금지 조치 (2012년 5월 1일)

2. 미국 캘리포니아주, GM식품 표시제도 강화에 대한 주민투표(11월 실시예정)

 

FDA urges removal of some Korean seafood products from the marketThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is urging food distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators to remove from sale or service all fresh, frozen, canned, and processed oysters, clams, mussels, and whole and roe-on scallops (molluscan shellfish) from Korea that have entered the United States. This includes molluscan shellfish from Korea that entered the United States prior to May 1, 2012, when the FDA removed such products from the Interstate Certified Shellfish Shippers List (ICSSL), and that which may have inadvertently entered the country after that date. These products and any products made with them may have been exposed to human fecal waste and are potentially contaminated with norovirus.

Molluscan shellfish contaminated with fecal waste and/or norovirus are considered adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Following initial notifications in May, a number of food companies have begun to remove these products from their distribution chain. However, many others have yet to take action.

A comprehensive FDA evaluation determined that the Korean Shellfish Sanitation Program (KSSP) no longer meets the sanitation controls specified under the United States’ National Shellfish Sanitation Program. The FDA’s evaluation found significant deficiencies with the KSSP including inadequate sanitary controls, ineffective management of land-based pollution sources, and detection of norovirus in shellfish growing areas.

The deficiencies in the KSSP prompted the FDA to remove all Korean certified shippers of molluscan shellfish from the ICSSL on May 1, 2012. Although Korean molluscan shellfish represent only a small fraction of the oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops sold in the U.S., the removal of Korean shellfish shippers from the ICSSL is an important step in stopping the importation of molluscan shellfish harvested from polluted waters.

These actions only affect molluscan shellfish harvested from Korean waters. They do not affect the receipt of fresh and frozen molluscan shellfish by distributors, retailers, and foodservice operators from any of the other shellfish shippers listed in the ICSSL. Further, these actions do not affect the importation of canned and other processed product made with molluscan shellfish harvested from non-Korean waters. The FDA is in ongoing discussions with Korean authorities to resolve the issue.

Press release

California to vote on GMO labelingAccording to the Associated Press, California voters will decide this November whether to require special labels for food made from genetically modified ingredients. Advocates collected more than half a million signatures supporting the stronger labeling requirements, and the Secretary of State has certified the measure for the state’s November ballot.

If it passes, California would be the first state to require labeling of such a wide range of foods containing GMOs. The proposal would require most processed foods by 2014 to bear a label telling shoppers that they contain ingredients derived from plants whose DNA was altered with genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria.

Many backers of similar legislation in more than a dozen states say the intent is to give consumers more information about what they’re eating, and foster transparency and trust in the food system. Major agricultural groups and the processed food industry oppose stricter labeling, saying it risks sowing fear and confusion among shoppers.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says genetically modified foods pose no greater health risks than traditional foods. Opponents of labeling rules say they could prompt hikes in packaging costs. If the measure passes, most raw or processed food made from plants or animals with engineered genetic material would need to be labeled, although certified organic foods and alcohol would be exempted. Meat and dairy products also would not require a label if the animals are fed with genetically engineered grains.

AP article




7/199, 총 게시물 : 3975
3855 "식용유값 2배 오른다고?" GMO가 뭐길래...비상 걸린 식탁 물가 식량안보연구소 2025-12-01 5 2400
3854 검증·수급·물가 ‘3중 리스크’ 안고 있는 ‘GMO완전표시제’ 재검토 긴요 식량안보연구소 2025-11-29 5 2405
3853 식품업계, GMO 완전표시제 졸속입법 우려…"물가·통상·검증문제 모두 미해결" 식량안보연구소 2025-11-27 5 2355
3852 [기고] GMO<유전자변형식품> 완전표시제, 소비자 알권리 위한 사회적 약속이다 식량안보연구소 2025-11-25 5 2386
3851 ‘식량 위기 속’ K-푸드가 넘어야 할 산 [유통-기자수첩] 식량안보연구소 2025-11-22 5 2351
3850 미 연방항소법원, ‘고도로 정제된 GMO 식품’ 표시 예외 뒤집다 식량안보연구소 2025-11-21 5 2355
3849 [칼럼] 문화영토시대의 한민족 음식문화 식량안보연구소 2025-11-20 5 2322
3848 소비자 81% “GMO 기술 필요성 공감”…안전성 우려는 ‘여전’ 식량안보연구소 2025-11-20 5 2373
3847 쌀 생산량 4년 연속 감소…쌀 재배면적 ‘역대 최저’ 식량안보연구소 2025-11-17 5 2394
3846 [열린마당] 촘촘한 GMO 안전성 심사 식량안보연구소 2025-11-17 5 2374
3845 식량안보 위협하는 기후재난, ‘문샷’ 연구로 돌파해야 식량안보연구소 2025-11-12 5 2480
3844 ‘K-푸드 기획사’ 설립, 콘텐츠 산업으로 전환을 식량안보연구소 2025-11-05 5 2485
3843 식량 위기 체계적 대응 식량안보 기본법 발의 식량안보연구소 2025-10-15 5 2595
3842 [식량안보세미나] 미래 식량 위기, 해법은 푸드테크 식량안보연구소 2025-10-14 5 2746
3841 GMO 완전표시제 도입 찬반 현격한 입장차…식약처 정책과 이슈 포럼서 격돌 식량안보연구소 2025-10-10 5 2570
3840 [김진수 칼럼] GMO식품 표시제 점진적으로 확대해야 식량안보연구소 2025-09-29 5 2516
3839 GMO 완전표시제 격돌…소비자 권리 vs 과도한 불안 식량안보연구소 2025-09-22 5 2577
3838 K-푸드, 글로벌 신화를 완성할 국가 전략이 필요하다 식량안보연구소 2025-09-15 5 2606
3837 [기고] 김밥, 세계화 열기를 도약의 계기로 식량안보연구소 2025-09-11 5 2518
3836 GMO, 안전성 논란과 과학적 근거-하상도의 식품 바로보기(421) 식량안보연구소 2025-09-11 5 2508
첫 페이지 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10     끝 페이지
이름 제목 내용
 
 
   
  A few images from Freepik.com